The use of recycled rubber and plastic as an infill for artificial turf systems may well be impacted by recommendations from the European Commission (EC) to introduce restrictions for the placing of intentionally added microplastics.
Published last week, the EC’s recommendations for restrictions for the placing of intentionally added microplastics onto the European market (Annex XVII REACH1) recommend a ban on the future sale of microplastic infill (most commonly end of life tyre shred) for synthetic turf systems, as the most effective way to reduce microplastic emissions.
The EC is proposing a six year transition period at point of sale before the new restriction becomes effective.
The EC's findings follow research published earlier this year that, for the first time, detected microplastic pollution in human blood for the first time, with scientists from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands finding the tiny particles in almost 80% of the people tested.
While the impact of microplastic pollution in on the body's health is as yet unknown, researchers are concerned as microplastics cause damage to human cells in the laboratory and air pollution particles are already known to enter the body and cause millions of early deaths a year.
While any EC legislation will only apply to its member nations in Europe, it is expected to impact the use of recycled rubber and plastic as an infill in synthetic sports and playground surfacase worldwide.
Responding to the recommendation, the European Synthetic Turf Council has released a position paper identifying risks and opportunities from the proposed ban.
Noting its agreement "with the goals ... (to) reduce the emissions of intentionally added microplastics as part of the wider European Green Deal for climate neutrality by 2050", the ESTC (the EMEA Synthetic Turf Council) highlights its work with many stakeholders (including international sports federations) to help develop the CEN Technical Report 175193 for infill control and mitigation.
Commenting on the EC's six year transition period before the new restriction becomes effective, it notes "current surfaces are expected to be usable for at least 10 years and many existing fields may struggle to achieve their full-service life due to an inability to purchase the materials required for on-going maintenance, forcing communities, schools and sports clubs to either replace their surfaces prematurely or risk deteriorations in the quality and safety of their fields.
"ESTC therefore calls for the transition period to be extended to at least 10 years to enable those that have recently invested in new fields to obtain the full operational life they anticipated."
ESTC goes on to point out that "the proposed legislation does not require any retrospective actions to be undertaken to current fields and this is also welcomed by ESTC as this would have been a significant burden on facility owners and operators. ESTC does, however, encourage everyone to ensure their fields are managed and maintained responsibly so they do not allow infill to migrate into the environment including the adoption of the guidance outlined in CEN Technical Report 17519 for all new fields that will use microplastic infills during the transition phase.
"The ban of intentionally added microplastic will not change the benefits of turf systems to the millions of people enjoying them each year. Synthetic turf fields offer high quality and long-lasting surfaces that allow communities throughout Europe to benefit from the health, social inclusion and mental wellbeing advantages that sport and physical activity provides in a wide range of different climates."
It also points out that "this decision will be a challenge to the majority of European markets in which infills classified as microplastics have proven to be the most popular. Although a lot of research and development efforts have been taking place in the period leading up to the decision of the European Commission resulting in very promising alternative solutions, the industry will find it challenging in all markets to fully transition within the proposed period of six years.
"This further reinforces the request to extend the transition period to at least 10 years to allow for a more controlled changeover."
Click here to view the ESTC position paper.
Click here to view the EC recommendation.
About the author
Nigel Benton
Co-founder/Publisher, Australasian Leisure Management
Nigel Benton is the co-founder and Publisher of Australasian Leisure Management, Australia and New Zealand’s only magazine for professionals in all areas of the leisure industry. Having established the magazine in 1997, shortly after his relocation to Australia, he has managed its readership rising to over 11,500 and its acceptance as the industry journal for professionals in aquatics, attractions, entertainment, events, fitness, parks, recreation, sport, tourism and venues.
In 2020, he launched the new Asian Leisure Business website.
Among a range of published works and features, his comments on a Blog (blogspot) from 2007 to 2011, when this website went live in its current form, may be interesting to reflect back on.
Click here to connect with him via LinkedIn.
Read more from this author
Related Articles
6th September 2022 - SAPIA counts down to 2022 conference
1st July 2022 - Conservationists welcome Australian Government’s commitment to addressing plastic pollution
23rd June 2022 - Australia launches new Plastics Innovation Hub in Vietnam
30th March 2022 - Polytan named Germany’s ‘brand of the century’
25th March 2022 - New study claims flaws in processes used to justify artificial turf sports fields
22nd March 2022 - Federal Government invests $60 million in recycling - but is it enough to stem the tide of plastic pollution?
10th March 2022 - ACT Government’s single-use plastics ban expanded to include Manuka Oval and GIO Stadium
22nd October 2021 - NSW Government releases report on use of synthetic turf in community sport
14th September 2021 - Australian Government declares its support for legally binding global plastics treaty
14th June 2021 - Sydney Council to install Australia’s first ‘environmentally sensitive’ synthetic football field
15th April 2021 - NSW Planning Minister to investigate alternatives to synthetic grass
22nd January 2020 - Margaret River Hockey Club set to receive new synthetic turf half-pitch with lighting
17th December 2019 - New synthetic surface benefits athletes in Geelong
10th December 2019 - Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces launches scheme to recycle old playground rubber surfaces
2nd December 2019 - Smart Connection Consultancy releases updated guidance for Synthetic Sports Surfaces
3rd October 2019 - Finest examples of play and sport project construction recognised at SAPIA Industry Awards
15th August 2018 - Port Adelaide athletes benefit from new synthetic sprint track
13th July 2018 - Smart Connection Consultancy releases world leading guidance for synthetic sports surfaces
10th April 2018 - Increasing use of synthetic turf in indoor training areas
18th January 2017 - New guide collates latest research on rubber infill for synthetic sports fields
9th December 2016 - ASTM International standard for artificial turf infill
8th December 2016 - Multi-purpose synthetic field opens at Greater Shepparton Sports Precinct
1st May 2015 - Synthetic sport surfaces seminars to cover Australia
16th April 2015 - New guidance on synthetic sports surface provision and usage
4th March 2015 - Sport surface consultant backs European Safety Standard for infill
23rd September 2014 - European Synthetic Turf Organisation recommends shock pads for synthetic sports fields
13th May 2014 - Synthetic sport surfaces guide distributed to councils and sport organisations
6th November 2013 - Tuff Turf commissions University of Ballarat to assess safety of recycled rubber in sport surfaces
2nd August 2013 - Regupol makes everroll rubber flooring easier to specify
24th January 2012 - FieldTurf responds on rubber infill safety
